• World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Editor’s Pick
Time And Sales Reporter
Editor's PickInvesting

Don’t Move the Swamp, Cut It!

by January 28, 2025
January 28, 2025

Chris Edwards and Tad DeHaven

President Trump campaigned on moving tens of thousands of federal workers outside the “Washington Swamp.” He initiated such efforts in his first term, and now a bipartisan group of lawmakers has introduced a bill to support the process. The sponsors say that the “Strategic Withdrawal of Agencies for Meaningful Placement (SWAMP)” Act would help “drain the swamp” in Washington, DC. 

Moving agencies elsewhere would reduce DC traffic jams, but we’re skeptical it would save any money. And we’re concerned that such efforts would distract policymakers from the more important task of cutting agencies to tackle exploding debt. We would rather see a bill to “Shutter Wasteful Agencies and Most Programs.”

SWAMP Act co-sponsor Rep. Jared Golden (D‑ME) said, “Redistributing federal agencies and jobs around the country would bring the government closer to the people.” But that is the opposite sentiment of President Ronald Reagan, who quipped, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.” We should shrink the government, not entangle it more closely in our lives. 

a

Federal relocation would impose new costs for logistics, leasing, and construction. Trump wants new buildings in beautiful classical designs. The SWAMP Act says that relocation costs would be offset by the proceeds of building sales, but government projects usually impose cost overruns and Congress would likely pass more funding for projects down the road. 

It would be more difficult for congressional committees and the White House to oversee agencies and meet with agency officials if they were spread across the country. And there would be new costs for flights and hotels for thousands of far-flung workers to attend meetings and hearings in DC. Federal decision-making would be slowed.

Moving agencies to distant cities could reduce workforce skillsets. Today, federal IT experts move between agencies within DC spreading knowledge around, while federal executives move around sharing best practices. That sort of cross-pollination would be lost if agencies were distributed and isolated.

Moving agencies closer to the people may have advantages, but it could also intensify the grip of special interests. If the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) moved to Iowa, for example, it would make that state’s economy even more dependent on farming and Iowa legislators more resistant to farm subsidy reforms.

A major relocation effort would create a new battlefield in Congress. The SWAMP Act calls for a competitive process for relocation decisions, but that is wishful thinking. The Congressional Research Service already tallies federal workers by district, and relocations would unleash members to fight for increases in their districts’ federal body count.

Trump moved some USDA and Bureau of Land Management workers out of DC, but Biden moved some of them back. Let’s say that Trump now moves USDA offices to Republican Iowa. Will the next Democratic president shift them over to, say, Illinois? Would Trump’s relocations launch endless and zero-sum migration drives of federal workers back and forth across the country?

We appreciate efforts to drain the DC swamp, but the way to do that is not by strategic withdrawal but by strategic shrinking. President Trump should eliminate the Department of Education as promised, not simply move it around.

previous post
Trump admin to pause financial assistance programs: report
next post
US consulate warns of gun battles, IEDs, kidnappings in Mexican border towns near Texas

Related Posts

Small-business AI use is lagging, but one firm...

June 26, 2025

Nvidia CEO Huang sells $15 million worth of...

June 26, 2025

Cobalt Prices Surge as DRC Extends Export Ban...

June 26, 2025

Settlement of Tranche 1 Share Placement

June 26, 2025

Lithium Universe LtdSettlement of Tranche 1 Share Placement

June 26, 2025

​Copper​ Market Hit by Major Supply Squeeze as...

June 26, 2025







    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.




    Recent Posts

    • Nvidia CEO Huang sells $15 million worth of stock, first sale of $873 million plan

      June 26, 2025
    • Small-business AI use is lagging, but one firm is channeling Sherlock Holmes and knocking out ‘grunt work’

      June 26, 2025
    • Find Highest Probability Counter-Trend Setups

      June 26, 2025
    • World leaders flock to meet with Trump at NATO Summit

      June 26, 2025
    • Poll: Majority of Republicans back Trump’s strikes on Iran; most Americans fear getting dragged into war

      June 26, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 timeandsalesreporter.com | All Rights Reserved

    Time And Sales Reporter
    • World News
    • Politics
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Brunswick Exploration Announces Brokered Private Placement for Gross...

    May 9, 2025

    What’s the Next US Copper Mine? 27 Copper...

    April 24, 2025

    Graphite Processing Expansion Opportunities

    June 19, 2025