• World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Editor’s Pick
Time And Sales Reporter
Editor's PickInvesting

The Right to Hug Your Kids

by January 30, 2025
January 30, 2025

Clark Neily

Among the most challenging and important questions in constitutional law is whether the constitutions of the United States and various individual states protect unenumerated rights—and if so, which rights. The Supreme Court has long held that the US Constitution does protect certain rights not explicitly set forth in the text, including the right to guide the upbringing of one’s children.

At issue in M.M. v. King is a policy of certain county jails in Michigan prohibiting in-person visits and forcing pretrial detainees and others to instead interact with their families, friends, and other loved ones exclusively through video conferencing and telephone calls. As a result, presumptively innocent arrestees who are detained pretrial have been prevented from seeing and hugging their own children for weeks, months, or even longer—and for no bona fide penological reason.

A state trial court dismissed a challenge to this no-contact, no in-person visitation policy, finding that the Michigan Constitution does not protect a right to family integrity or specifically for incarcerated parents—including ones who are being held pretrial and are therefore presumed innocent—to hug their own children.

On appeal, Cato joined an amicus brief with more than a dozen other organizations and individuals, including the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Children’s Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, arguing that incarcerated parents have a right to in-person visits with their children. Besides the constitutional argument, the brief summarizes extensive social-science data showing that in-person visits (a) mitigate the harm of incarceration to children as well as parents; (b) aid in the peaceful administration of jails by reducing prisoner misconduct and aggressive behavior; and (c) facilitate reentry into society by helping maintain potentially stabilizing family ties.

It is hardly surprising that neither the US Constitution nor any state constitution explicitly protects the right of a parent to hug their own children because the idea that the government would gratuitously interfere with such a basic expression of love and affection is almost incomprehensibly dystopian. But the mere fact that a given right is not expressly set forth in a constitution does not mean there is no such right, nor does it relieve the judiciary of its obligation to protect that right from infringement by the government.

previous post
Why Do Illegal Immigrants Have a Low Crime Rate? 12 Possible Explanations
next post
Cato Tax Bootcamp: The Quest for Radical Tax Reforms

Related Posts

Lithium Universe LtdSpodumene Offtake Update

June 2, 2025

Blue Lagoon’s Dome Mountain Joins BC’s Select List...

June 2, 2025

Ore Reserve Quadruples for Rhyolite Ridge Project; Reaffirms...

June 2, 2025

Cardiex Receives TGA Approval for CONNEQT Pulse Device

June 2, 2025

Harmony Gold to Acquire MAC Copper in US$1.03...

June 2, 2025

Editor’s Picks: Gold Faces Bumpy Week on Trade...

June 1, 2025







    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.




    Recent Posts

    • Senate Republicans eye changes to Trump’s megabill after House win

      June 2, 2025
    • Trump shares post saying Biden was executed, replaced with clones

      June 2, 2025
    • House Dems’ campaign chair says her party’s ‘on offense’ in 2026 battle to win back majority from GOP

      June 2, 2025
    • Kevin Hassett ‘very, very confident’ courts will back Trump’s tariffs amid legal setback

      June 2, 2025
    • Rand Paul says he would support ‘big, beautiful bill’ if debt ceiling hike removed

      June 2, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 timeandsalesreporter.com | All Rights Reserved

    Time And Sales Reporter
    • World News
    • Politics
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Diseased Illegal Immigrants Aren’t “Invading” the United States

    January 21, 2025

    Tech 5: OpenAI Restructures, Apple Pursues AI Search,...

    May 11, 2025

    CEO Appointment

    May 19, 2025