• World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Editor’s Pick
Time And Sales Reporter
Editor's PickInvesting

Will Trump’s “Reciprocal Trade” Only Go One Way?

by February 7, 2025
February 7, 2025

Scott Lincicome

On February 7, President Donald Trump announced his intention to unveil a “reciprocal tariff” system sometime next week, so that the United States is “treated evenly with other countries.” Trump didn’t provide details of how such a system would work. But it appears he wants US tariffs on countries’ imports to match their tariffs on US exports: “They charge us. We charge them. It’s the same thing.”

Such a system raises a host of legal, economic, and practical concerns, but, being a Friday afternoon and all, I just have two basic questions for now: 

First, does this mean that the US government will reduce tariffs on imports from the many countries that have lower tariffs than we have?  As Figures 1 and 2 show for trade in manufactured goods and other non-agricultural goods, the United States does not have the lowest tariffs in the world and instead ranks somewhere in the middle among wealthy, industrialized countries. (Tellingly, only really poor countries have very high tariffs, but that’s a discussion for another time.) Should Trump’s system be based on average tariff rates, then “true” reciprocity would require US tariff rate reductions on goods from dozens of countries. 

As seen in Table 1, moreover, a country-to-county comparison would raise similar questions. There, we see that tariffs applied on US non-agricultural exports by the United States’ top export markets are about the same—sometimes a little higher, but also sometimes a little lower (see bold/​italic numbers)—as those applied by the United States on the same goods from the same places.

By this metric, a new reciprocal system means reduced US tariffs on manufactured goods from Europe, Mexico, Canada, or the UK, where, depending on how you measure the average, tariffs are actually lower than what the United States applies.

Second, will there be reciprocity for the other protectionism?  As I wrote a few months ago:

…Washington uses many “non-tariff” measures to impede foreign competition. This includes subsidies, quotas, “Buy American” restrictions, the Jones Act (drink!), and regulatory protectionism like the FDA’s blockade on baby formula. We’re also one of the biggest users of “trade remedy” measures (anti-dumping, especially) and today apply more than 700 special duties on mainly manufactured goods like steel and chemicals.

Indeed, according to the independent Global Trade Alert, which monitors nations’ trade liberalization and protectionist policies, the United States has had the most “harmful” trade interventions—tariffs, non-tariff barriers, subsidies, etc.—of any nation since late 2008. 

harmful trade interventions

One can reasonably quibble with the organization’s methodology, but that wouldn’t change the basic point: many foreign nations do have protectionist barriers against American goods, services, and investment, but the United States is no saint here either. Instead, all countries’ trade policies have their political sacred cows (sometimes literally targeting cows!), and some countries are surely better than others. But the idea that the United States must adopt “reciprocity”—and in the process become a tariff-wielding protectionist outlier—because of some grave historical trade injustice is just detached from reality.

previous post
Sotomayor criticizes presidential immunity case as putting the high court’s legitimacy on the line
next post
‘JOE, YOU’RE FIRED’: President Trump revokes Biden’s security clearance, intel briefings

Related Posts

Krispy Kreme stock plunges after doughnut chain pauses...

May 9, 2025

UnitedHealthcare sued by shareholders over reaction to CEO’s...

May 9, 2025

Brunswick Exploration Announces Brokered Private Placement for Gross...

May 9, 2025

NorthStar Gaming Announces Receipt of Management Cease Trade...

May 9, 2025

$2.6M Placement and SPP to fast-track China entry...

May 9, 2025

Drill Contract Awarded for Elizabeth Hill. Technical Visit...

May 9, 2025







    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.




    Recent Posts

    • UnitedHealthcare sued by shareholders over reaction to CEO’s killing

      May 9, 2025
    • Krispy Kreme stock plunges after doughnut chain pauses McDonald’s rollout, pulls outlook

      May 9, 2025
    • Don’t Buy Robinhood Stock… Until You See This Chart Setup

      May 9, 2025
    • GOP senators: Congress should vote on Trump’s potential Iran nuclear deal

      May 9, 2025
    • White House highlights over $2B in savings from DEI cuts during Trump administration’s first 100 days

      May 9, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 timeandsalesreporter.com | All Rights Reserved

    Time And Sales Reporter
    • World News
    • Politics
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Answering Frequently Asked Questions about the Inflation Reduction...

    March 17, 2025

    California homeowners allege home insurance companies colluded to...

    April 24, 2025

    The Indefinite Suspension of All Refugees Is Unjustified

    January 27, 2025