• World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Editor’s Pick
Time And Sales Reporter
Editor's PickInvesting

A New K-12 Productivity Chart

by March 10, 2025
March 10, 2025

Neal McCluskey

Over the years, many people have inquired about updating the chart below, which plots change in academic achievement for the nation’s 17-year-olds—the “final products” of our education system—against change in public school spending. The chart shows that spending grew precipitously while performance was basically flat. There are a couple of significant problems with updating the chart, and today I offer a stab at a new version that attempts to deal with them.

Spending versus NAEP to 2012

The first problem is that the test on which the original chart is based—the National Assessment of Educational Progress Long-Term Trend Assessment (LTT NAEP)—has not been administered to 17-year-olds since 2012. It is impossible to take it any farther. The good news is that in addition to the LTT, there is the “main” NAEP. It does not extend as far back as the LTT, but it does have longitudinal results up to 2019 for high school students; in its case, 12th grade. Note that various iterations changed from previous administrations, reflected in two scores—the old and new—in 1998 and 2004.

The second problem is tougher. The original chart plots the percentage change in inflation-adjusted funding for students’ full K‑12 careers against the percentage change in test scores. The main problem is that while percentage changes in spending are easy to understand, it is not clear what a percentage change in a test score means. Is a scale score rising 2 percent meaningful change or not? Second, while possible increases in spending are unbounded—you could get a one million percent increase in spending if you tried wasting taxpayer money hard enough—once a test score hits the top of the scale, it has nowhere to go.

To deal with the end of LTT in 2012 and scale score equivalency, the new chart does two things:

  • Adds main NAEP scores for high school students.
  • Plots the change in the percentage of students surpassing “proficient” on the “main” NAEP and the middle-performance level on the LTT. This compares both spending and performance in percentage terms and with a more concrete measure than a scale score. Still, readers must decide for themselves if the change is good, bad, or indifferent.

I also added two trends not in the original chart: change in GDP per capita and federal spending per school-aged American. The reason for adding GDP is that generally speaking, scores should rise if Americans’ material well-being increases and decline if it falls. I added the federal line because the federal role in education is being hotly debated right now, and it is important to have some broad evidence of whether federal spending is helping. Finally, to make isolating lines a little easier, you can add or subtract them from the chart by clicking on the legend.

What does the chart suggest?

While spending and GDP have risen substantially, high school performance in reading has been on a slightly declining trend. That suggests, that regardless of how much a given amount of increased spending should translate into higher achievement, spending has not been having the effect many want, at least on its own.

For math, the results are a little tougher. Linear trend lines show that roughly 2.8 percent annual increases in per-pupil spending and 2.7 percent annual increases in GDP coincided with a .26 percentage point annual increase in test takers exceeding the middle performance level in LTT math, and a .02 percentage point annual increase in students hitting proficiency.

The federal spending line is a little tougher to deal with because of the huge 2009 spending surge during the Great Recession. The trend is about a 3.6 percent increase annually, with the outlier included. Without it, the change is about 3 percent annually.

As mentioned, there is no definitive answer about the “right” outcome per dollar, but to put a little more flesh on the bones, here are the endpoints for achievement and spending:

The LTT math results are perhaps encouraging—an 8 percentage point rise in students clearing the middle score band—but overall, the chart suggests that we have not been getting much bang for our buck in education spending.

Does the chart need more work? I look forward to hearing from you.

previous post
Religious slaughter in Syria shows need for US, Europe to ‘keep a close eye’ on Islamist regime: Greek FM
next post
The Good and Bad of the New Executive Order on Public Service Loan Forgiveness

Related Posts

RemSense Capital Raising

August 4, 2025

Tech 5: Tesla and Samsung Strike Deal, Palo...

August 3, 2025

JPMorgan marks 1,000th branch opening since 2018 expansion...

August 2, 2025

Crypto Market Update: Markets Pull Back After Fed...

August 2, 2025

Silver Crown Provides Corporate Update

August 2, 2025

Albemarle Swings to Profit, Lowers Spending Amid Prolonged...

August 2, 2025







    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.




    Recent Posts

    • Kamala Harris back in national spotlight as James Comer floats subpoena in Biden ‘cover-up’ probe

      August 4, 2025
    • Dr. Oz touts investment in Medicaid: ‘I’m trying to save this beautiful program’

      August 4, 2025
    • Trump accuses Senate Democrats of using nominee confirmations as leverage for funding deals

      August 4, 2025
    • RemSense Capital Raising

      August 4, 2025
    • Trump 1.0 alums share chilling Google message from before second-term return: ‘LAWFARE at its finest’

      August 3, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 timeandsalesreporter.com | All Rights Reserved

    Time And Sales Reporter
    • World News
    • Politics
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Biggest Canadian Defense Contractors and ETFs in 2025

    July 17, 2025

    U.S. online stores put ‘out of stock’ signs...

    June 12, 2025

    Crypto Market Recap: Bitcoin Price Nears All-time High,...

    June 12, 2025