• World News
  • Politics
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Editor’s Pick
Time And Sales Reporter
Editor's PickInvesting

New Essay: Public Health as If People Mattered

by March 17, 2025
March 17, 2025

Michael F. Cannon

Tear Down This Wall: Liberating Patients to Access Out-of-State Telehealth - event photo

Five years ago this month, the world shut down due to COVID-19. “Paris, Milan, London, New York, San Francisco, and even Delhi—even India, the entire country—locked down in the most dramatic deprivation of freedom, which we couldn’t have even imagined.” Government responses dramatically reduced the threat of COVID-19 but also eroded trust in public health officials. An ongoing measles outbreak in Texas and surrounding states and the threat of H5 bird flu are again raising the question of what steps the government may legitimately take to stop the spread of contagious diseases.

In a new essay, I offer a framework for answering that question: government public health interventions are legitimate only to the extent they minimize the amount of violence in society.

Nonconsensual transmission of dangerous pathogens is an inherently violent act. A virus or bacterium can be as deadly as a bullet or a blade. Government exists to prevent and to provide remedies to violence. Government may therefore intervene in public health for the same reasons it may justly act in other areas.

But only up to a point. Government public health efforts themselves introduce violence. Government achieves its ends through coercion—i.e., threats and the use of physical violence. Some public health measures are themselves coercive. Even taxes that fund otherwise noncoercive public health measures involve coercion. Government may legitimately intervene only if a given public health intervention would minimize the net amount of violence in society.

This approach allows significant scope for government public health activities. The successful campaign to eradicate smallpox passes the violence-minimization test with flying colors. New York State’s imprisonment of alleged typhoid spreader Mary Mallon does not. Some actions that governments took during COVID-19, notably subsidizing vaccines, pass the test. Many others, like slamming young men to the sidewalk for not masking, do not. Some interventions that initially passed the test failed it when effective vaccines became available. 

Violence minimization is a more egalitarian and welfare-enhancing goal for public health officials than maximizing economic efficiency or even saving lives. It can also improve government public health efforts. To the extent government public health activities disregard autonomy, they can engender distrust and even resistance among civilians who see their own government as denying their equality by robbing them of autonomy. Prioritizing saving lives over autonomy can thus cause—and has caused—government public health efforts to backfire.

The essay, “Public Health as If People Mattered,” appears in the current issue of Social Philosophy & Policy (Cambridge University Press).

Social Philosophy and Policy 41, no. 2 (2024).

previous post
Land-Use Regulations Make Housing Less Affordable
next post
Fani Willis ordered to pay $54K for violating open records laws in Trump case

Related Posts

Canada Makes Tech Leadership Moves: Axl Launches, Carney...

June 23, 2025

Thick zones of HM mineralisation observed across Douala...

June 23, 2025

Editor’s Picks: Silver Price Hits 13 Year High,...

June 23, 2025

Tesla agrees to first deal to build China’s...

June 22, 2025

Tech 5: OpenAI/Microsoft Talks Get Tense, SoftBank Floats...

June 22, 2025

Oil prices rise more than 1% as Israel...

June 21, 2025







    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.




    Recent Posts

    • US Strikes Iran: What Comes Next For Stocks?

      June 23, 2025
    • Inside the Situation Room, where Trump and his national security team monitored ‘spectacular’ success on Iran

      June 23, 2025
    • Thomas Massie says he feels ‘misled’ by Trump after Iran strikes: ‘He’s engaged in war’

      June 23, 2025
    • JD Vance says Iranian nuclear program ‘substantially’ set back after ‘precise, surgical’ US strikes

      June 23, 2025
    • Israeli President Herzog: Israel ‘not dragging’ US into war with Iran

      June 23, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 timeandsalesreporter.com | All Rights Reserved

    Time And Sales Reporter
    • World News
    • Politics
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Editor’s Pick

    Read alsox

    Stroke of the Pen, Law of the Land:...

    February 6, 2025

    The President Has a Duty to End the...

    March 21, 2025

    Mali Court Seizes Control of Barrick Gold Mine...

    June 20, 2025